What constitution?

John showed me this video of Congressman Trey Gowdy of South Carolina questioning "Tiller the Killer's" good friend and Obama-appointed Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. On the surface it may not seem important...but it is. It's important to show this because the arguments on all of today's controversial topics have been framed in a way that displays a side that gets away with claiming they are "fair", or "bipartisan", against some backwater, sexist, Christian fundamentalist, obviously racist caricature, unable to have intelligent debates. This guy has the right idea....with liberals (whose politics have become their religion,) just stick to the facts, and the legal issues. You almost feel embarassed for Sebelius trying to excuse her lack of constitutional knowledge...weakly saying "the separation of church and state" (does she know that's not actually in the constitution? and more importantly, does she know what that means?)

  This is what I've been trying to express with Tom Woods' "Nullification" ideas. The way to fight the liberals from morally (and otherwise..) bankrupting this country is to look back to the document that has always guided this country to being the most just and envied land on Earth. We don't give enough credit to the framers and the conflicts they had to foresee to write a constitution that  would endure.

   When I look back at Obama's election night speech, where he spoke so enthusiastically about people who question whether the "dream of our founders is alive in our time", and how his election is "their answer," I wonder what he knows of the founder's or the constitution. How could he have made so many decisions violating that dream, all the while seeing himself as some savior? He spoke then of a union of people, not divided red/blue states...and yet he has been the most divisive president ever.  Have you ever seen another president use every chance they can to put the other party down? Everything he does and says he has this condescending attitude-like he knows everyone bows down to him and he can get away with murder. Nothing can be seen as a truly bipartisan effort. None of his staff ever or himself have to answer for anything they do. And now he's even putting down the authority of the U.S. Supreme Court...i.e. "the unelected group of people". He's just so perfect we no longer need checks and balances or that dern constitution huh? It's too easy to say all these issues important to Obama are for "the good of the people", but no one will look at what it truthfully is. It's about power. When a politician promises something 'free' to his constituents (not to mention the 'free' involves tax dollars), it's all about undermining your own rights, so that what you do have, in effect belongs to the state, and every aspect to do with said goods, is under the rule of the state. Your increasing dependence secures their dominance.

    It seems Obama's administration have gotten a little too comfortable never having to answer to anyone. Liberals are such hypocrites, with selective memories...I still have a little faith in the wisdom of the U.S. Supreme Court as they have ruled in favor of religious liberty, even if that means allowing a church to hire/fire whomever they choose. I don't understand how people can be so blind as to not see how much this administration has inched, no sped towards a totalitarian government, with mandates for every thing we do...they instead focus on the aforementioned caricature that doesn't really exist.